Let me know if you need me to make any adjustments to the content blocks.
So how does a change request actually work?
How am I, or others, are able to change content on that wiki?
E.g. I would like to propose to change the explorer to https://www.radxplorer.com/
//EDIT
Nevermind, I think I have just done it. ;D
1 Like
The current ACL allows everyone to change anything?
Yes but tiered by $XRD holdings, so the Homepage is 100k XRD, comments are 10k etc. If the proposal is approved then we should think about what the correct thresholds should be.
Of course it’s possible to lock pages or assign editors but I’d want to avoid that if possible.
Agree it should be RadXplorer throughout.
I looked at it and surfed it, but I still think it is not yet there. It’s quite far from the standard that you’d expect from existing documentation platforms/cms.
Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the effort and I agree on the general idea that currently the radix documentation is all over. But you are putting technical aspects over the usability and clarity for devs.
There are a lot of things that are not yet there with the website, starting from layout, hierarchy of content, navigation, color palette, to basic functionality that you find on other established platforms. It would take a lot of work honestly to make your project reach that standard and I don’t think it’s worth at this moment investing so much when are plenty of solutions there.
The other thing we should keep in mind is that the current documentation, even if it’s all over the place is pretty well indexed by search engines and AI can find it and use it pretty well. So moving to a new CMS might disrupt this, but moving to a custom platform I’m afraid will screw up completely SEO and whatever was indexed so far.
So from my point of view, as I’ve said earlier, going with an established solution is the way to go. Self hosted or paid, whatever works.
1 Like