Does the Radix DAO Want to Own Its Governance Layer?

[Temp Check] Does the Radix DAO Want to Own Its Governance Layer?

A DAO needs fully decentralized, on-ledger governance as its end-state — not a multisig or off-chain coordination. At some point the community has to decide how to get there:

  1. Build it from scratch — months of design, dev, testing, and audit, funded by the DAO.

  2. Acquire something that already exists and meets the bar.

I’ve built Muanprotocol, a candidate for path 2. Raising it here to find out if the community would be interested in the DAO acquiring and owning it. No rights have been claimed — the intent is a full handover.

What It Is

Muanprotocol is a composable governance framework, not a one-DAO tool. Under DAO ownership it does two things at once:

  • Gives the Radix DAO its own fully on-ledger governance with proposal-gated execution directly on the ledger.

  • Serves as a reusable framework any project, sub-DAO, or treasury on Radix can deploy with their own rules and execution scope.

Questions

  1. Does the community agree the Radix DAO needs fully decentralized, on-ledger governance as its end-state?

  2. If yes — acquire an existing protocol, or build from scratch?

If there’s appetite, I’ll follow up with a detailed proposal covering scope, audit, transition, and compensation — shaped by this thread.

1 Like

I agree on that, for what I have looked and read it should be very useful, and also a must have to manage Radix in a decentralized way.

More, I just added another proposal where I exactly state that this is the protocol I would like to use in Root V2 proposal